When it comes to the Church of Latter Day Saints, does “keeping the body healthy” actually mean “keeping the body heterosexual”?

I was browsing BuzzFeed the other day and came across an article that caught my eye about Mormonism and the nature/nurture conversation concerning sexual orientation (http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/mormon-church-sexuality-is-not-a-choice). According to the article, the Church of Latter Day Saints now recognizes that homosexual attractions are physiologically based and that “individuals do not choose to have such attractions.” While this may seem like a step towards acceptance for the Mormon church, it goes further to assert that though being attracted to someone of the same sex is not, in and of itself, sinful, “acting on it is.”

Mormonism is a religion that places great emphasis on “keeping the body healthy.” As such, devout Mormons do not drink alcohol, consume caffeine, do drugs, etc, all under the guise of keeping one’s body healthy, as it is only on loan from God. If, however, our bodies are on loan from God, and homosexual tendencies are biologically based, is it not a natural conclusion that God loaned us these bodies in this condition, homosexual attractions and all? By definition, isn’t it “against nature” (and, as a logical extension, unhealthy) to refrain from acting on any natural attractions?

This entry was posted in Spark Post and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

What do you have to say about this?

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s